City Council 9-5-05

BACK to News

SUNFISH LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING – APRIL 3, 2007

7:00 P.M. - ST. ANNE’S EPISCOPAL CHURCH

Attendants:

      Mayor Molly Park

      Councilpersons: Judy MacManus, and Richard Williams.

      City Attorney: Timothy Kuntz

      City Building Official: Russ Wahl

      City Engineer: Donald Sterna

      City Planner: Laurie Shives

      City Forester: James Nayes

      City Clerk: Cathy Iago

            and Members of the General Public.

      Councilpersons Joel Bennett and Cathy DeCourcy were absent.

1.   CALL TO ORDER:           Mayor Park opened the meeting at 7:00 p.m.

2.   APPROVE AGENDA:       Councilmember Williams moved approval of the Agenda, seconded by Councilmember MacManus and carried.



3.   CONSENT AGENDA:       Mayor Park asked if there were any comments from the Treasurer regarding the financial statements or any questions regarding items on the Consent Agenda.

Treasurer Blair explained that the expenditures to date are in line with the budget.

      Councilmember MacManus moved approval of the Consent Agenda, seconded by Councilmember Williams and carried:

a.       Minutes of March 6, 2007 Regular Council meeting.

b.       Accounts Receivable Billings Report.

c.       Monthly Financial Statements – March, 2007.


4. COMMENTS FROM THE GENERAL PUBLIC: Mayor Park asked if there were any comments from the public regarding items not listed on the agenda.

John Spath, President of the Hornbeam Lake Association, was present and explained that he and his son, along with Peggy Rabis, attended a public meeting in Inver Grove Heights to discuss proposed development adjacent to his property. He stated that he spoke to Tom Link, Community Development Director in Inver Grove Heights, and asked what Sunfish Lake residents could do to express their concerns and attempt to prohibit the proposed High-Density Residential development in this area. He explained that Mr. Link responded that the “ball” is in Sunfish Lake’s court. Mr. Spath requested that the City take a firm stance to oppose the proposed development along with the residents.

Councilmember Williams asked if the proposed interchange was discussed. Mr. Spath responded no.

Councilmember Williams pointed out that Inver Grove Heights wishes to install an interchange in this area after the rezoning of the property occurs that would handle traffic from the development in that City and the City of Eagan. He commented that in his opinion one issue to be addressed is the fact that the water quality of the lake would most certainly be affected by the amount of concrete used for the interchange and the proposed high-density      residential development.

Mr. Spath noted that years ago the City of Sunfish Lake gave Inver Grove Heights the property now used for the car dealerships and it may be appropriate for Inver Grove Heights to give up this parcel to Sunfish Lake.

      Councilmember Williams noted that was a number of years ago and he does not believe that would happen.

Mayor Park explained that she had been in contact with the City Planner regarding this issue after hearing from Mr. Spath and she requested the Planner prepare a letter listing the City’s concerns.

Planner Shives distributed a copy of the letter she prepared. She stated that she had contacted Tom Link to advise him the letter would be sent for recording at the public meeting held this evening and that it reiterates the City’s concerns relating to the proposed development of the Northwest Area in Inver Grove Heights and the land use designation adjacent to the Spath property.

Scott Spath explained that he was given the distinct impression from Mr. Link that residents should outline their concerns and respond to Inver Grove Heights within the next few months. He indicated that if the City is not willing to participate in sending correspondence, he would form a private group to do so.

Councilmember Williams pointed out that other cities, such as Mendota Heights, also expressed concerns and he does not believe they were advised of the public meeting. He further stated that the DNR may also have concerns relating to Hornbeam Lake. He noted that forming a group would be appropriate and work on the issues can be divided; he also agreed that a response to the City of Inver Grove Heights should be presented within the next few months. He offered to work with residents on this matter. He commented that it may be difficult to persuade Inver Grove Heights regarding the rezoning of the parcel; however it would be appropriate to raise the issues they would face if the rezoning occurs.

Mayor Park questioned if Inver Grove Heights also has to adhere to the Shoreland Overlay regulations. Planner Shives responded that the DNR regulations would apply and normally the DNR requires low density development near water.

Mayor Park asked the Attorney what the proper procedures would be to appoint a Task Force to study this matter.

Attorney Kuntz stated he would not comment since he has a conflict of interest.

Scott Spath stated it may be time to address the conflict of interest since Mr. Kuntz serves as City Attorney for both cities.

Councilmember Williams pointed out that if the City of Sunfish Lake decides to pursue the matter it would be necessary to hire special counsel and so would Inver Grove Heights. He asked the City Attorney if he would be correct in assuming that no more than two members of the Council could attend a meeting of the Task Force.

Mr. Kuntz responded yes.

Councilmember MacManus agreed that something needs to be done in a timely manner.

Mayor Park suggested that Councilmember Williams serve as Chair of the Task Force and that John and Scott Spath also serve. Both John and Scott Spath agreed to serve on the Task Force.

Mayor Park asked if there were any further comments and there was no response.

5.   PLANNING COMMISSION:

a.   Chase New Home at 2165 Charlton Road: Site and Building Plan Review.   Planner Shives explained the request from Santanni Custom Homes, Inc., on behalf of Roger and Barbara Riley and Jackie and Mike Chase, to remove the existing home located at 2165 Charlton Road and to construct anew home on the property. She stated the applicants are requesting approval of site and building plan review, a conditional use permit to allow construction of a new home on a non-conforming lot of record and two variances from side yard setbacks to accommodate the location of the new home.

The Planner stated that the request requires approval of a CUP to allow for redevelopment of an existing non-conforming lot of record. She further explained that the applicant is also requesting approval of a 35-foot variance from the side yard setback/right-of-way on the east side of the property and a 6-foot variance from the side yard setback on the west side of the property for construction of the new home. She noted that the proposed structure would be in compliance with the front yard setback requirements and would not exceed the height restrictions. She stated that the grading would be limited to the garage and driveway areas and that the applicant proposes to reconfigure the existing driveway. She stated the new home is consistent with the criteria for the Site and Building Plan Review.

Planner Shives explained that the applicant is proposing to remove three trees to accommodate the new home building site and that a landscape plan has been submitted and indicates the installation of 70 new trees. She noted that the City Engineer identified that eleven of the trees proposed for installation are located within the right-of-way for Charlton Road and he recommended that a condition be included to require the eleven trees be moved to other locations on the site outside of the right-of-way.

Ms. Shives further explained that the proposal is consistent with the CUP review criteria for redevelopment that encourages development of single family homes that are similar in size and characteristics of homes in the area. She noted that the City’s Comprehensive Plan guides the property as Low Density Residential and the proposal is consistent and compatible with the Comprehensive Plan.

Planner Shives explained that the two variances being requested are based on the irregular shape of the lot that limits the normal buildable area and the fact that the lot has a power line and a 50-foot power line easement running through a portion of the buildable area of the lot. She noted that with the requested 35-foot side yard setback from Charlton Road and a 6-foot side yard setback from the west property line reasonable use of the property does not exist due to the easements and lot shape.

Staff recommends approval and the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the requests due to the fact that the Comprehensive Plan encourages redevelopment, the variances are based upon the irregular lot shape, power line and easements and that the Site and Building Plans meet all criteria.

The Planner noted that one letter from a concerned resident was received relating to the variance request, and that no additional comments were presented at the public hearing.

The following persons were present representing the applicants, Builder Ron Santanni, Tim Johnson of Southview Design, and Cynthia Betts from Edina Realty.

Councilmember MacManus stated that the applicants would be her neighbors and she believes the plan is well thought out; she had no concerns.

Mayor Park asked the location of the existing home from the right-of-way.

The Planner advised the current home is 75-ft. from the right-of-way and the new home would be at 65-ft.

Councilmember Williams pointed out that the plantings would add additional screening of the new home.

Mayor Park asked if there would be only one driveway entrance. Mr. Santanni responded yes.

Mayor Park asked if the new homeowners are aware of the fact that Charlton Road may be paved in the future.

Jackie Chase responded yes and stated that is why some of the trees are being removed at this time.

Mayor Park stated that in her opinion it will be a beautiful home and a welcome addition to the community. She commented that “tear downs” of existing homes and replacing them with new homes maybe be the wave of the future. She suggested that in the future the Council may wish to discuss the City’s position on this trend.

The Mayor asked what would be done with the old well and septic system. Mr. Santanni responded that both the well and septic system would be filled in according to Code and that copies of the documentation would be sent to Dakota County.

Mayor Park asked if there were any further comments and there was no response.

Councilmember Williams asked if all requests could be handled under one motion and the Planner responded yes.

Councilmember Williams moved to approve the following items with conditions and findings as listed in the Planner’s report, seconded by Councilmember MacManus and carried:

1.   Conditional Use Permit based on a finding that the request is consistent with the requirements of the
      Zoning Ordinance and the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and will be compatible with surrounding
      land uses.

2.      A 35-foot Variance to allow construction of a new home 65-feet from the side yard property (right-of-way) line abutting Charlton Road based on a finding that non-economic hardship has been demonstrated and due to the irregular lot shape, power line, and 50-foot power line easement that encumber the lot.

3.      A 6-foot Variance to allow the construction of a new home 44-feet from the west side yard property line based on a finding that non-economic hardship has been demonstrated and due to the irregular lot shape, power line, and 50-foot power line easement that encumber the lot.

4.   Site and Building Plans to permit the construction of a new home on a lot located at 2165 Charlton
Road, subject to the 5 Conditions as listed in the Planner’s report.


b. Request to Stockpile Soil on Mager Development Site. Planner Shives explained the request from the Acadia Group on behalf of property owners Don and Shirley Mager to allow for temporary soil stockpiling on a 30-acre vacant parcel at the intersection of Salem Church Road and Windy Hill Road. Staff has recommended approval of the soil stockpiling with several conditions that are listed in the planner’s report. The Planner advised that the Planning Commission held a public hearing and discussed the application at their March 21 meeting and received comments from concerned residents adjacent to the site. She stated the neighboring residents were concerned that the stockpiling would cause drainage and erosion problems to their properties and also questioned whether this proposal was actually permitted under the Zoning Ordinance.

Ms. Shives stated that the Planning Commission unanimously recommended denial of the application based on a finding that the proposal is not consistent with the Major Review criteria and that the request is not clearly defined as a permitted use. She advised that if the Council wishes to take action to deny the request, staff has prepared resolution that lists findings of fact as a basis for denial of the request. She read the findings as listed in the resolution.

Councilmember Williams questioned if the applicant had identified the source of the fill. The Planner responded no and explained that Mr. Kampmeyer stated the soils would be brought from various sites in Inver Grove Heights.

Mayor Park asked if the applicant was present and the Planner responded no.

      Councilmember Williams asked if the City had allowed any stockpiling in the past without submission of a development plan for a specific site.

      Engineer Sterna responded that he has worked for the City for eleven years and he was not aware of any requests for temporary stockpiling with the exception of placing soil in conjunction with a development plan for berming purposes.

      Planning Commissioner Svendsen stated he recalled that the O’Leary parcel had a sand and gravel mining operation many years ago.

Mayor Park asked the City Engineer where the applicant was planning to store the temporary soils.

Mr. Sterna responded that the soil would be placed on an existing driveway in a ravine area between two mounds of earth. He noted that this area has already been disturbed by placement of a roadway and the stockpiling would not affect any potential building sites; he further stated this location is the least conspicuous and would blend with the topography as the natural vegetation from seeding grows.

Mayor Park asked Police Chief Shaver if he recalls debris being dumped on the site along the dirt roadway on this parcel and if he believes that the stockpiling may exacerbate the dumping in this area.

Chief Shaver stated there had been dumping in the area and he agreed that the stockpiling might encourage additional dumping on the site.

Gretchen Keenan, 3 Windy Hill Court, state that residents on Windy Hill Court made their concerns very clear at the Planning Commission meeting; the concerns related to the stockpiling being unsightly, possible contamination of the soil, and the potential to cause additional drainage onto neighboring properties. She explained that the neighbors are also concern that there is no formal development plan and that the neighbors would not be opposed to single-family development of the property.

      Councilmember Williams stated that even if the neighbors supported the proposal, he would oppose the request.

Councilmember MacManus agreed and express her displeasure with the request to use the site as a dumping ground.

Councilmember Williams commented that even if all went well with this request, he believes approval would set precedence and it would be difficult to deny future requests.

Mayor Park pointed out that she has requested staff to send letters to various residents regarding storage of unsightly materials on their property and therefore she would not support the request. She further stated that she believes the time limit for the request is lengthy.

Engineer Sterna explained that staff placed the 5-year time limit on the stockpiling; it was not requested by the applicant.

Councilmember Williams called the question.

Attorney Kuntz explained that he and the Planner prepared a draft resolution for denial of the request that includes additional findings of fact and outlines the issues raised by residents at the public hearing. He indicated that the comments from Chief Shaver could also be included as part of the basis for denial. He explained the language could be stated as; “Sporadic dumping of soil on the subject site may make enforcement, policing and control of illegal dumping more difficult at or near the subject site.”

Council concurred to include the language proposed by the Attorney.

Mayor Park asked if there were further comments and there was no response.

Councilmember Williams moved, seconded by Councilmember MacManus, to adopt Resolution No. 07-06 titled, A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR DENIAL OF TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILING ON THE MAGER PROPERTY (NW QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF SALEM CHURCH ROAD AND WINDY HILL ROAD) AS PROPOSED BY THE ACADIA GROUP, LLC, with the revised findings of fact as listed and above-stated by the City Attorney. Motion carried

c.    Zoning Ordinance Amendments Relating to Illicit Discharges into the City’s Storm Water System. Planner Shives explained that the City completed an update of its Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan in January, 2006 and in order to be in compliance with the plan, must adopt regulations relating to illicit discharge of pollutants into the City’s Stormwater Drainage System. She stated that staff drafted a proposed ordinance amendment which outlines procedures and requirements for discharges into the City’s Strom Drain System. She noted that a public hearing was held at the Planning Commission meeting and no comments were received.

Councilmember Williams commented that there are no storm water basins in the City. The Planner and Engineer explained that there are a few areas in town.

Mayor Park expressed concern regarding the language under Item 4, Discharge Prohibitions, on page 4 of the document as it relates to swimming pools and the PPM chlorine amount. She explained that her pool is vinyl and each year approximately one-third of the water is drained from the pool; she indicated that pools are usually highly chlorinated and questioned if she would be in violation of the ordinance.

Engineer Sterna explained that most likely she and numerous residents in the metro area are in violation; he also noted that fire hydrants are flushed each year and they also contain high chlorine levels. He offered to discuss the matter with the water resource personnel in his office and report back to Council.

Mayor Park noted that the new pool located at the Overbee/Costley residence has no chlorine and she indicated that it might be appropriate to educate the residents on this type of pool. She questioned if the ordinance should be passed at this time.

Engineer Sterna suggested tabling the matter to the next meeting to allow him time to discuss it with his staff.

Councilmember Williams moved, seconded by Councilmember MacManus, to table the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment relating to Illicit Discharges into the City’s Storm Water System to the May 1, 2007 meeting and request staff to provide information on regarding draining swimming pools, and carried.

d.   Outdoor Events in INS District. Planner Shives reported that the Planning Commission discussed the proposed event to be held at Bethel Baptist Church this summer and whether or not it would be beneficial to amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow such events under an Interim Use Permit. She noted that the Commission concurred it maybe more appropriate for staff to send a letter to the Church that outlines concerns relating to traffic, noise, parking and policing the site after the event.

Councilmember Williams expressed concern that the vocalist scheduled to appear is well known and what happens if there is actually a much larger crowd. He suggested that it maybe worthwhile for the City to establish some type of permitting procedures for events if the attendance numbers exceed 500.

Planner Shives explained that the Church has now stated the number of persons attending the event would be approximately 300, versus 1,000 as initially indicated. She also pointed out that although the ordinance allows for “related social events” in the INS District, she does not believe this is a typical church social event.

Councilmember Williams pointed out that his concern is a separate issue from this request and relates to whether or not an event permit should be issued if an event exceeds a certain number of people in attendance or is carried on over a period of time.

Planning Chair Bulach noted that the Commissioners based their finding on the fact that church has had events in the past that were well conducted and that the number of persons attending had been substantially decreased. He pointed out that the church should be able to control the activities and the parking lot should accommodate the smaller number of attendees. He questioned if the City would be liable if the permit were issued. He also indicated that the Commission concurred to give the church the benefit of the doubt to behave appropriately as in the past.

Councilmember Williams indicated that the City may be more liable by not issuing a permit. He suggested that certain types of gatherings within the City may have a larger impact on residents and if this type of request happens more often the City may have to address the matter.

Attorney Kuntz pointed out that the City would not have liability either with or without a permit.

Police Chief Shaver commented that if the event attendance exceeds the occupancy of the parking lot, he most certainly wished to be contacted to draft a parking and traffic safety plan with the church. He also noted that the Fire Chief may also wish to provide input.

Mayor Park explained that she and staff were planning to have a discussion with church representatives regarding all the concerns raised this evening.

Councilmember Williams indicated that since the number has been reduced he would support the Commission recommendation; however, he suggested it may need to be discussed in the future.

Planner Shives stated that she raised the issue of amending the ordinance with the Planning Commission after previous discussions with Council regarding their concerns and delayed the meeting with the church until a determination was made by Council. She recommended that she schedule a meeting with the church to discuss the issues.

Council concurred with her recommendation. Mayor Park requested that after the initial contact the Planner prepare a report for Council. Ms. Shives agreed.

Council thanked the Planner for her report.

Attorney Kuntz noted that the stockpiling request was denied with additional findings of fact and that State Statutes require the Planner to send a copy of those findings to the applicant. He suggested that due to the involvement of the adjacent property owners, it maybe appropriate for the Planner to also send a copy of those findings to anyone that received a copy of the public hearing notice.

Council concurred and requested the Planner also send copies to appropriate residents.

6.   INSPECTOR’S REPORTS:

a.       CITY ENGINEER: Spring Roadway Limit Restrictions: Engineer Sterna stated that the city streets have been posted for springtime load restrictions, with the exception of Charlton Road. He noted the load limits will stay in effect through the month of March and April and could possibly extend into the first week of May. He advised that Charlton Road has experienced some “blow out” areas and that the grading along the roadway was fair to poor; he stated he would discuss this with Pine Bend Paving. He also noted that dust control would be applied to Charlton Road this year.

Street Sweeping: The Engineer explained that he scheduled the sweeping of all paved City streets for mid-April to remove the de-icing material from these roadways. He explained the sweeping would be done with a pickup broom in order to remove the material as opposed to sweeping it into ditches. He advised this sweeping is part of the City’s Water Quality Management Procedures, per the City’s NPDES permit.

Charlton Road Grading: Engineer Sterna stated he has scheduled a light regarding of Charlton Road to remove the washboarding and fill in the potholes which developed during the spring thaw. He reminded Council that typically the road is more aggressively regraded in mind to late May and additional gravel would be added at that time in locations that require maintenance. He also noted that some trees and shrubs may need to be removed to re-establish drainage ditches.

Salem Church Road Pothole Repairs: The Engineer explained that Salem Church Road has several location where potholes have appeared due to subgrade and pavement failure that will need to be repaired. He advised that the bituminous plants are not yet open, but that he would try to find an interim fix for the potholes.

Charlton Road Guardrail Repair: The Engineer sated that a guardrail along Charlton Road was damaged during the winter and two posts were broken off; he advised these repairs would be done in April.

Councilmember Williams asked when the seeding on Acorn Drive would germinate. Mr. Sterna responded that the ground must warm up before germination would occur; he stated he would review the areas this spring.

Mike Hovey explained that an email was received on the City website regarding a telephone pole that fell over on Salem Church Road. He noted the pole fell because the wood had rotted and he questioned if all the telephone poles in the City would be checked.

Councilmember Williams commented that he believes XCel Energy has a regular maintenance program.

Mayor Park stated she called Collette Jurek of XCel Energy and left a message asking what the company is doing to insure this would not happen again.

Engineer Sterna stated he would also call Collette to follow-up on the matter.

Mike Hovey also noted that the “No Crossing” sign at Charlton Road and Highway 110 was down and laying in the median. The Engineer stated he would contact MnDOT regarding the sign.

Attorney Kuntz asked if those involved in the construction of the Chase residence are planning to attend a
pre-construction meeting and are aware of the fact that the load limits are in place. Mr. Sterna stated he would remind them of the restrictions. Mayor Park pointed out that it was mentioned in the field prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Inspector Wahl sated that Mr. Santanni had mentioned the construction would not begin until the load limits were removed.

Mayor Park asked the Engineer when he would begin the study for Charlton Road. Mr. Sterna responded that he has started the project and would prepare a report for the June Council meeting.

Council thanked the Engineer for his report.

b.       BUILDING OFFICIAL: Inspector Wahl stated he conducted 3 inspections in March and issued 2 permits.

Council thanked Inspector Wahl for his report.

c.       CITY FORESTER: Mayor Park explained that Forester Nayes was out-of-town. Councilmember Williams advised that the trees approved for removal on Zehnder Road have been cut down.

Mayor Park explained that Sunfish Lake received the Tree City USA aware for 2006 and suggested a news release be placed on the website. She reminded residents of the Arbor Day celebration on May 5, between 8:30 and 10:30 a.m. She also noted that Councilmember DeCourcy had offered access to the park from her property on Angell Road to eliminate traffic problems from parking along Salem Church Road.

d.       PUBLIC SAFETY: Chief Shaver was present and reported on the hiring of new officers and a crime prevention person. Mayor Park invited the Chief to attend a future meeting to discuss Identify Theft and preventative measures.

Mayor Park distributed the Public Safety Report and noted that the False Alarm numbers were higher this month compared to the same time period for last years. She stated that new residents are given packets of information that advise them to try to keep the number of false alarms to a minimum and also advises that the City requires that they have their septic systems pumped every two-years.
Mayor Park asked if the Chief had noticed any difference in service with the inception of the County dispatch offices. The Chief stated he has not noticed a difference and pointed out that the 800mgh system would provide the ability for officers to contact agencies state-wide during a disaster.

Council thanked the Chief for his report.


7.   Status Report of PERA Issues and Consultant Contracts.   Attorney Kuntz explained that he has been in contact with the PERA representative regarding the consultant contract issue, however; he has nothing new to report.

      Council thanked Attorney Kuntz for the update.

8.   OTHER BUSINESS:

a. Report on Deer Management Discussion with Neighboring Cities. Mayor Park explained she met with neighboring cities to discuss deer management procedures and found that Mendota Heights has a program that uses volunteer professional bow hunters to thin the deer herd; she stated they performed the service for free approximately 5 or 6 years ago. She also explained that the hunters are used in June or July and are not limited to the bow hunting season. She stated the Mayor of West St. Paul explained he has contact with someone who could conduct a flyover of the City to count the deer. She stated that he suggested this be done in high season, but she questioned if the deer could bee seen with the foliage on the trees. The Mayor advised that there was also discussion relating to how to pay for this service.

Chief Shaver explained that they could use infrared cameras to see the deer.

Inspector Wahl asked if there was any plan to remove the Wild Turkeys. Councilmember MacManus stated she has several turkeys on her property and Councilmember Williams stated he counted 52 on his property last year.

Mayor Park suggested that Council could discuss regulations regarding feeding of wildlife. Chief Shaver stated that West St. Paul has an ordinance regarding feeing wildlife and offered to send it to the Mayor.

b. New Business: Attorney Kuntz explained that staff has had discussions regarding stockpiling of materials related to construction and non-construction modes and also regarding stockpiling not incidental to construction; such as mining excess materials from another community.

The Attorney posed a question to Council regarding whether or not they wish the Planner and staff to review this matter further to determine if the ordinance should be more explicit.

Councilmember MacManus indicated this issue has come up a few times during construction, but this is the first request for stockpiling not in conjunction with discussion.

Councilmember Williams stated he does not wish to increase construction cost and he agreed that Council should review the matter.

Engineer Sterna explained that there was a previous request to stockpile on the Schadegg parcel, when it was owned by Metzen. He further noted that stockpiling does have had an effect on the buildable area of a lot.

Council concurred to direct the Planner to review the matter, request regulations from other communities and report back to Council.

Planning Chair Bulach commented that he had concerns relating to the tone of the letter from Dr. Abramowicz, specifically the commented that indicates the elected and appointed official are not interested in upholding the current City vision.

Councilmember Williams pointed out that the letter appears to make an impassioned plea and that Dr. Abramowicz obviously feels very strongly about the subject; he does not believe it was meant to be offensive.
Mr. Bulach suggested that Dr. Abromowicz attend the City meetings to see how the elected and appointed officials conduct business.

Mayor Park asked if there were any further comments and there was no response.

9.   ADJOURN:            Councilmember Williams moved for adjournment at 8:40 p.m., seconded by Councilmember MacManus and carried.

Molly Park, Mayor                                                  Catherine Iago, City Clerk

BACK to News