BACK to News

SUNFISH LAKE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING – MARCH 21, 2007

7:00 P.M. - ST. ANNE’S EPISCOPAL CHURCH

Attendants:

       Chair Eberhard Bulach

      Commissioners:  Arnulf Svendsen and Joanne Wahlstrom.

      City Planner:  Laurie Shives

      City Engineer:  Donald Sterna                     

      City Clerk:  Catherine Iago  

            and Members of the General Public.

      Commissioners Andrea McCue and Tom Votel were absent.

I.    CALL TO ORDER:         Chair Bulach opened the meeting at 7:15 p.m.

II.  APPROVE AGENDA:      Chair Bulach asked if there were any comments or corrections to the December 20, 2006 Commission minutes as presented and there was no response.
     
Commissioner Svendsen moved to approve the December 20, 2006 Planning Commission minutes as presented, seconded by Commissioner Wahlstrom and carried 3-0.

Chair Bulach asked if the Chair and Commissioners should be sworn in. Clerk Iago explained that since these are appointed positions versus elected positions the swearing in is not required. She stated that Commissioners Wahlstrom and McCue were reappointed to serve two-year terms and that Commissioner Bulach was appointed as Chair of the Planning Commission for 2007.

III.A.   Public Hearing/Consideration of Site and Building Plan Review/Conditional Use Permit/Variance for
            Construction of a New Home on a Non-Conforming Lot of Record at 2165 Charlton Road: Riley/Chase.
     

Planner Shives stated the applicants are requesting approval of site and building plan review, a conditional use permit to allow construction of a new home on a non-conforming lot of record and two variances from side yard setbacks. She explained that the current owners, Roger and Barbara Riley, plan to sell the home to Jackie and Mike Chase. Mr. and Mrs. Chase are working with Santanni Custom Homes, Inc. and plan to tear down the existing home and construct a new home on the site.

The Planner advised that the property is zoned Single Family Residential and it is not located in the Aircraft Noise Abatement Zone, but it is located within the 1,000-foot Shoreland Overlay District. She stated that the request requires approval of a CUP to allow for redevelopment of an existing non-conforming lot of record. She further explained that the applicant is also requesting approval of a 35-foot variance from the side yard setback/right-of-way on the east side of the property and a 6-foot variance from the side yard setback on the west side of the property for construction of the new home.  She noted that the proposed structure would be in compliance with the front yard setback requirements and would not exceed the height restrictions. She stated that the grading would be limited to the garage and driveway areas and that the applicant proposes to reconfigure the existing driveway.

Planner Shives stated that the drainfield locations have been reviewed and approved by the City Septic Inspector. She explained that the applicant is proposing to install five door lights that would be equipment with a light shield to assure that none of the list is emitted above 45 degrees and that seven recessed can lights are also proposed. She stated that the applicant is proposing to remove three trees to accommodate the new home building site and that a landscape plan has been submitted and indicates the installation of 70 new trees. She noted that the City Engineer identified that eleven of the trees proposed for installation are located within the right-of-way for Charlton Road and he recommended that a condition be included to require the eleven trees be moved to other locations on the site outside of the right-of-way.

The Planner advised that the house is proposed to be located in the center of the property to maximize setbacks from surrounding properties, Charlton Road and the existing power line and it would have no negative impact on neighboring properties.  She explained the applicant is proposing to use shake siding and earth-tone colors on the exteriors of the home.  She further explained that the City’s Comprehensive Plan guides the property as Low Density Residential and the proposal is consistent and compatible with the Comprehensive Plan.   

Planner Shives explained that the two variances being requested are based on the irregular shape of the lot that limits the normal buildable area and the fact that the lot has a power line and a 50-foot power line easement running through a portion of the buildable area of the lot.  She noted that with the requested 35-foot side yard setback from Charlton Road and a 6-foot side yard setback from the west property line reasonable use of the property does not exist due to the easements and lot shape.

Staff recommends approval of the requests due to the fact that the Comprehensive Plan encourages redevelopment, the variances are based upon the irregular lot shape, power line and easements and that the Site and Building Plans meet all criteria.  

Chair Bulach asked if there were any comments from the public and hearing no response he closed the public hearing.

Commissioner Svendsen commented that the Planner had indicated the location of the new home versus the existing home appears to lessen the non-conformity of the structure on the lot.

 Planner Shives stated that granting the variances would not lessen the non-conformity from the east side of the property, but it would lessen the non-conformity from the side yard setback along the west.

Chair Bulach asked the City Engineer to comment on the fact that the plans do not show any culverts at the street.

Engineer Sterna explained that although the plans do not show the culverts, he has discussed the matter with the applicant and recommended the ditch be excavated and a 15” pipe installed.     

Commissioner Wahlstrom asked if new drawings should be submitted. Mr. Sterna responded that he does not believe that is necessary and that he would work with the applicant, who is agreeable to the recommendation.

Chair Bulach asked if there were any further comments.

Ron Santanni, builder, explained that if the applicant were to conform to the set back requirements, the lot would be unbuildable due to the irregular shape and easements. He stated that the proposed new home would be a great improvement to the lot.

Cynthia Betts was present representing Mr. & Mrs. Chase, and noted that the new owners are excited to move into the area and wish to maintain the natural state and culture of the site.

Barb Riley, current property owner, stated she supports the requests and that she has enjoyed living in the City and would be moving to be closer to her daughter.   

Commissioner Svendsen asked if all items could be included in one motion. Clerk Iago responded yes.  

Commissioner Svendsen moved, seconded by Commissioner Wahlstrom, to recommend approve the following items with conditions and findings as listed in the Planner’s report:

1.   Conditional Use Permit based on a finding that the request is consistent with the requirements of the 
      Zoning Ordinance and the intent of the comprehensive Plan and will be compatible with surrounding
      land uses.
 

2.      A 35-foot Variance to allow construction of a new home 65 feet from the side yard property (right-of-way) line abutting Charlton Road based on a finding that non-economic hardship has been demonstrated and due to  the irregular lot shape, power line, and 50-foot power line easement that encumber the lot.

3.      A 6-foot Variance to allow the construction of a new home 44-feet from the west side yard property line based on a finding that non-economic hardship has been demonstrated and due to  the irregular lot shape, power line, and 50-foot power line easement that encumber the lot.
 

4.      Site and Building Plans to permit the construction of a new home on a lot located at 2165 Charlton Road, subject to the 5 Conditions as listed in the Planner’s report.

Motion carried. 3-0

 

III.B.   Public Hearing/Consideration of Site and Building Plan Review/Conditional Use Permit/Variance for
Construction of a New Home and Related Accessory Structures on a Vacant Lot at 230 Salem Church Road: Flynn.

 

Planner Shives explained that the applicant indicated he wished to move the location of the home and asked for clarification if the matter should be considered this evening or if the applicant is going to be required to submit a revised site plan.

Vince Flynn, applicant, stated that the home had been in the planning stages and after the building area was staked, he determined it was not the best location for the home on the site. He noted that the plans would be revised to relocate the home 50-feet to the west and pivot the home for a better fit on the lot and to lessen its visibility from the closest neighboring lot. He apologized that he was unable to have the finalized revised plans available rather than just a concept drawing and asked if the Commission would be willing to act on the concept plan.

Chair Bulach stated that normally the applicant would be asked to resubmit the plans for a major change.

Planner Shives recommended that the public hearing be continued and action on this matter be tabled to the April 18 Planning Commission meeting. She stated that if the applicant provides the revised plans by Friday of this week it would allow staff time to review them prior to that meeting.

Chair Bulach stated that the changes appear to be large enough to require staff review and he would support the staff recommendation.

Judd Stattine, Project Manager, asked if the matter would definitely be heard in April if plans are turned in by Friday.

 Planner Shives responded yes, and stated that staff also needed time for renotifcation to the neighbors regarding the public hearing.

Vince Flynn requested a point a clarification and noted that there are no encroachments, that the overall plan has not changed, and that all setbacks would be met with the new location for the home. He indicated he has spent substantial time and money on the project and would prefer it not be delayed.

Chair Bulach expressed concern that if the Commission reviewed the materials prior to staff review it may establish precedence for future applications. Commissioner Wahlstrom agreed.

Commissioner Svendsen pointed out that in the past the Commission had reviewed a project and provided a temporary approval subject to submission of all documentation.

Planner Shives pointed out that with the third option for the home location that was presented this evening there are several unanswered questions and staff would prefer to have the final drawings for review.

Kyle Hunt, builder for the project, asked if the Commission or staff could point out any concerns or issues related to the plan at this time.

Engineer Sterna stated that when he initially reviewed the building plans, he believed the home would be better suited in this location on the site. He stated that he agrees with the Planner that the building plans must still be revised and submitted for staff review to address the height, grading and drainage. He noted that contours for the property would be needed and pointed out that the current driveway location would be placed over a drainfield area. He also noted that there is a City pond located on the property and one option for the driveway relocation would be through that area; however, he would need to review a revised plan to determine the relocation of the pond if that occurs.  He noted that he would prefer to have more defined grading and contour plans and that the drainfield issue needs to be addressed.

Mr. Flynn questioned if the matter would heard before Council in May if the application is tabled at this time. He asked for input from the Commission regarding the revised plan.

Chair Bulach explained that the Commission has experienced problems in the past by trying to accommodate a rushed schedule and therefore he would prefer to delay the matter to receive staff input. He commented that in his opinion the home appears beautiful and he is excited that it will be built in the City.

Mr. Hunt explained that they cannot do percolation tests on the property due to the frozen ground and noted that the driveway currently is located across the drainfield area. He questioned if the drainfield location could be delayed until such time as testing could be accomplished.

Planner Shives explained that the City has approved site and building plans pending the septic locations and that the site appears to have adequate area for locating the drainfields.

Engineer Sterna expressed concern that the driveway should not be located across the drainfield. He pointed out that the new proposed home location appears to be the most logical place for the building site.

Mr. Hunt commented that he is aware of the fact that one of the issues related to the height requirement is drainage factors and that the elevation of the home may be changed due to the new location. He noted that the height requirement may change the architectural features of the home and questioned how the height limitation was established.

Gretchen Keenan stated that she resides on Windy Hill Court and several residents in that area had to modify their plans to accommodate the height restriction. She indicated that the lower height was to insure that the view of the lake was not obstructed for neighboring properties.

Mr. Kampmeyer explained that several years ago a home was constructed at 55-feet high and he believes that was the rationale for the lower height restriction. He agreed that some of the homes on Windy Hill Road and Roanoke Road do not appear architecturally correct due to the lessened height; he stated he believes the restriction should be changed and that each home should be reviewed on its own merits.

Chair Bulach stated that the restriction is in place and that council would have to request that the Commission review an ordinance change if it were to be changed.

Chair Bulach asked if there were any further comments and there was no response.

Mr. Flynn asked if he was required to waive his rights to the 60 day review period so that the matter could be tabled to the next meeting and if the waiver should be in writing.
 

Planner Shives responded yes and asked that he submit the written waiver this evening. Mr. Flynn agreed. 

Commissioner Wahlstrom moved, seconded by Commissioner Svendsen, to continue the public hearing on the Flynn application to the regular Planning Commission meeting held on April 18, 2007, to allow staff time for renotifcation to neighbors and to review the revised plans for the new location of the home. Motion carried. 3-0          

Commissioner Svendsen moved, seconded by Commissioner Wahlstrom, to table action on the application submitted by Vince Flynn for property located at 230 Salem Church Road to the April 18, 2007 regular Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried.  3-0 

 

III.C.   Consideration of Request for Temporary Soil Stockpiling on the Mager Property at Windy Hill Road and Salem Church Road.

 

Planner Shives explained the request for review of an application to allow temporary soil stockpiling on the Mager property located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Salem Church Road and Windy Hills Road. She stated the site contains approximately 30-acres and is currently vacant. She advised the property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential and is guided for low density residential uses by the Comprehensive Plan.  She noted that the applicant had originally submitted an application that was withdrawn due to outstanding issues and concerns raised by City staff; the applicant has now submitted revised plans that address staff’s concerns.

Ms. Shives stated the applicant is proposing to stockpile 5,600 cubic yards of soil on the subject property and has submitted a preliminary future development plan for the site that indicates the proposed location of 8-single family home sites. She explained that the applicant is proposing to stockpile the material within an existing driveway area that would ultimately serve as a private drive for some of the future home sites. She advised that it was noted by the City Septic Inspector that septic drainfields cannot be located within disturbed areas, and therefore placement of the soil material on the site would render those areas used as a temporary stockpile location unsuitable for future drainfield sites. She also noted that the applicant is proposing to add soil to the stockpile during the spring and summer of 2007 and indicated that in early fall 2007 the entire stockpile would be seeded and mulched to re-estalish permanent turf.

The Planner explained that the City Engineer reviewed the plan and has recommended a condition of approval be attached that requires the temporary stockpile be removed or that the soil be placed in its final location on the subject site within a 5-year time period. Additionally the Engineer recommends that a $20,000 Letter of Credit be submitted to the City prior to any placement of soil on the site in order to assure that the conditions of approval are adhered to.

Ms. Shives reviewed the Major Review Evaluation Criteria as outlined in her report and stated that the soil stockpiling may have an adverse effect on adjacent properties as a soil stockpile is not in harmony with the adjacent developed and landscaped properties. She noted however, the location of the temporary soil stockpile is such that it would be screened from adjacent residential properties by the existing topography and vegetation. She also advised that upon future development of the subject site, the temporarily stockpiled material could be used to establish berms that would provide screening and buffering of the new development.

The Planner stated that staff recommends approval of the request, subject to the nine (9) conditions listed in the Planner’s report.

Chair Bulach asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak.

Michael Kampmeyer of Acadia Group was present representing the property owners, Don and Shirley Mager. He stated that there is natural berming between the existing homes on Windy Hill Road and sufficient variation in topography to screen the stockpiling area. He noted that 5,600 cubic yards of soil would produce a 200 ft. x 200 ft. area approximately 5-ft. high and would not be visible to most properties, with the exception of one area on Salem Church Road. He also noted that the stockpiled materials would be used to create berms that would screen the future development in this area.

Chair Bulach asked if there were any comments from the audience.

Tracy Ward, 1 Windy Hill Court, stated her rear-yard faces the area and she believes the request goes against the current City regulations for stockpiling. She explained that when her home was constructed she received letters from the City Engineer requesting that the soil materials be moved from her property. She further explained that she has concerns regarding increased drainage onto her property and that the site is an eyesore as you enter the City.


Marie Nelson, 9 Windy Hill Court, stated she agreed that there are issues with drainage from the site flowing onto the Ward property and she believes the stockpiling may increase the drainage problem.

Ms. Ward stated she wished to discuss possible solutions to the existing drainage problem from the adjacent property with the City Engineer and that she believes future development in this area will increase the current problem and cause flooding on her property.  She noted the major issue in her opinion is the 5-year timeframe for stockpiling the materials and that she preferred the applicant submit a formal development plan prior to granting approval of the stockpiling request. She commented that she did not wish to look at a silt fence for 5-years.

Mr. Kampmeyer noted that Ms. Ward would not be able to view the stockpiled materials from her property. He also explained that the materials would be seeded in the fall to establish turf and the silt fence would be removed at that time.

Sherry Hansen, 7 Windy Hill Court, commented that the street is not called “Windy Hill” Court for nothing. She agreed that the 5-year timeframe is unacceptable and noted that all the lots along her street were flat and soils from the home construction on the lots were used for berms.

Chair Bulach asked if there were further comments and there was no response            

Chair Bulach explained that he performed some calculations and found that if the 5,600 cubic yards of soil were spread over the entire 30-acre site it would only increase the level of the land by approximately 1-1/2 inches.  He stated that the adjacent property owners were aware of the fact that this parcel would eventually be developed when they purchased their lots. He commented that the City cannot deny the property owner the right to develop the parcel and that in his opinion the property owner appears to be planning ahead for future development.

Gretchen Keenan, 3 Windy Hill Court, stated she does not oppose the development of the property and that the previous owner had drafted a preliminary plan for the site. She commented that in her opinion the regulations appear to be getting more lenient and noted that when her pool was constructed she was told to move the soils off her property and was not allowed to construct a berm on her property.

Engineer Sterna explained that there were extenuating circumstances on the Ward property and he advised that no changes could be made that deviate from what was shown on the initial building and site grading plan. He noted that no berms were initially shown on the Ward’s building plan and that was why they received a letter requesting their removal.

Ms. Ward disagreed and explained that the landscaping plan showed the berms and that she was not allowed to keep any soil materials on her property for any length of time.

Mr. Sterna explained that berming would be shown on the grading plan and the plantings to be placed on the berm would be shown on the landscaping plan. He noted that he reviews the grading plans for home construction to insure that the drainage flows away from the home and that berming is not considered landscaping. He further noted that if a property owner wishes to change any grading on their property, the plan would have to be revised.  He pointed out that applicant proposes to use the stockpiled materials on this site in the future to provide a buffer between the existing and future homes. He also stated that no property owner on Windy Hill Court submitted an application or a request to bring in soils for berming on their property. He commented that all the drainage on this site originally flowed to the southwest and the stockpiling would not change the flow.  He noted that the NPDES permit requires dust control measure be in place and the applicant is required to restore turf on the stockpiled materials within 7 to 14 days; the topsoil needs to be stripped, re-seeded and the permit remains in force until 70 percent of the turf is established. He further advised that the drainage ditches would be reinforced with additional rock.

The Engineer discussed the fact that the ideal location on the site for placement of the stockpiled materials would be along the west property line due to the fact that berming in this area would prevent runoff and it would be a good location for ponding. However, he noted that placement of the stockpiled materials in the proposed future driveway area on the site maintains the applicant’s options for future development of the site and does not limit the future lot configurations.
Mr. Kampmeyer agreed that berming along the rear portion of the Ward property and construction of a pond in that area would alleviate the drainage issues.

Ms. Ward questioned why the applicant is not placing the stockpiled materials in that area at this time.

Ms. Keenan questioned why the applicant is not submitting a plan for development at this time and noted development of the property would improve the appearance since it is one of the entrances to the City. She also indicated it would address drainage issues relating to her property and the Ward property.

Commissioner Svendsen asked if stockpiling is an allowed use. Chair Bulach stated it is the first time a request has been submitted not in conjunction with a development plan, although it is not a restricted use.

Mr. Kampmeyer explained that Mr. Mager does not wish to spend a substantial amount of money to plat the property at this time and that he believes the property owner would be willing to work with the neighbors when platting occurs to address the drainage issues and install berming to screen their properties.

Ms. Keenan asked where the soils would be coming from, how they are measured and who would be checking for contamination.

Mr. Kampmeyer explained the soils would come from various sites and all of the sites have had Phase I Environmental Studies conducted on the soils. He noted that he lives in the City and has no desire to bring in contaminated soils.

Ms. Keenan noted that all of the neighbors she has had contact with along Windy Hill Court are opposed to the request; she also noted that the O’Leary’s had submitted a letter opposing the request. She commented that staff has not shown the residents it is an allowed use and that she believes the rules change with different applications.

Ms. Ward stated she is not opposed to development of the property, but she wished to see a plan for development.

Chair Bulach pointed out that this is the largest parcel within the City yet to be developed and he indicated that he believes developer should be provided some benefit of doubt. He commented that a formal development plan would be preferable, but the concept plan shows only 8 lots in excess of 3-acres each.

Commissioner Svendsen advised that he is hesitant to support the proposal since there is no precedence for this type of application and there is no evidence to support that stockpiling is an allowed use.

Commissioner Wahlstrom agreed and commented that if this were adjacent to her property she would be outraged.

Chair Bulach asked if there were any further comments and there was no response.

Commissioner Bulach moved, seconded by Commissioner Svendsen, to recommend denial of the request for temporary soil stockpiling on the Mager property (NW Quadrant of the intersection of Windy Hill Road and Salem Church road) based on a finding that the project is not consistent with the Major Review evaluation criteria outlined in Section 1208.04 of the Zoning Ordinance and the fact that there is no evidence to support that stockpiling is an allowed use. Motion carried. 3-0
   

IV.       Public Hearing: Consideration of  Zoning Ordinance Amendments Relating to Illicit Discharges into the
City’s Storm Water System.

                             

Planner Shives explained that the city completed an update of its comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan in January, 2006 and in order to be in compliance with the plan, the city must adopt regulations relating to illicit discharge of pollutants into the City’s Stormwater Drainage System. She stated that staff has drafted a proposed ordinance amendment which outlines procedures and requirements for discharges into the City’s Strom Drain System.  She noted that a public hearing must be held and input received.

Engineer Sterna explained that the proposed regulations are also a requirement of the NPDES permit.
Chair Bulach asked if there were any comments and there was no response.  Chair Bulach closed the public hearing.

Commission Wahlstrom moved, seconded by Commissioner Svendsen, to recommend adoption of the Ordinance Amending the Storm Water Management Section of the City Zoning Ordinance Relating to Illicit Discharge of Pollutants into the City’s Stormwater Drainage System. Motion carried. 3-0

 

V.   Other Business/New Business:

 

A.     Outdoor Events in INS District. Planner Shives explained that Bethel Baptist church had discussed the possibility of a summer social event for a large group of people. She advised that no parameters or criteria are included in the existing Zoning Ordinance to prohibit such an event and that the current Ordinance allows for “related social events” although it does not provide any criteria. She explained that the City Attorney suggested Council may wish to consider a provision in the Ordinance that allows such events under an IUP - on an interim basis.

The Planner stated that staff is requesting direction from the Commission regarding whether or not to begin preparation of an ordinance amendment to provide for such events to be held in conjunction with an Interim Use Permit application.

Chair Bulach commented that there are large numbers of people attending church on holidays and for such events and he does not believe 300 people would cause problems. He suggested that the matter be handled through discussion with the church representatives and that staff outline the City concerns relating to traffic, sanitation and parking.

Commissioner Svendsen agreed and explained that he had a large group of people attend a graduation event at his home and no permit was required.      

Commissioner Wahlstrom explained she lives near the church and there have been outdoor events in the past that were noisy but were closed by 10:00 p.m. She stated that the church has always cleaned up debris and been cognizant of the neighboring properties.

The Planner suggested that staff and a Council representative could meet with the church representatives to discuss any concerns.

Chair Bulach asked if there had been any requests from the other churches in the City for such events.

Planner Shives stated she was not aware of any other requests and noted that another option would be to initiate a special events permitting process.

The Commissioners concurred that it would be more appropriate for staff to send a letter to the church that outlines concerns such issues as traffic, sanitation, parking, and ask that the Church be sensitive to neighboring properties.  

Chair Bulach commented that if problems occur the City would still have the option to discuss an amendment.

 

B.     2008 Comprehensive Plan Update.  The Planner explained that a work program was developed by staff that outlined the time-frame for the mandated 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update. She stated that a meeting was scheduled for Monday, March 26, with representatives from the Metropolitan Council staff, City staff, Mayor Park and Councilmember McManus and Chair Bulach to discuss the City of Sunfish Lake designation. She noted that the Met Council suggested Diversified Rural Community designation which is not consistent with the City due to the fact it is mostly developed at this time. She stated the meeting would be to discuss the Met Council rationale for their suggested designation. She indicated that the current Rural Residential designation for the City appears to be more fitting for the community. She stated that she would keep the Commission informed on this matter.

 



Planner Shives stated she would not be in attendance at the next meeting due to her upcoming wedding but that one of her company’s principals, Steve Grittman would be covering the April 18th meeting. The Commission offered their best wishes and congratulations to Laurie.

Chair Bulach stated he would be unavailable to attend the April meeting and asked Commissioner Svendsen to Chair the meeting; Commissioner Svendsen agreed.

 

VI.    ADJOURN:  Commissioner Svendsen moved, to adjourn the meeting at 9:15 p.m, seconded by Commissioner Wahlstrom and carried. 3-0

 

Catherine Iago, City Clerk

 

 BACK to News